Team | Win | Loss | Conference | Score | ||
1 | Ohio St. | 8 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 143.51 |
2 | LSU | 7 | - | 1 | SEC | 139.92 |
3 | Kansas | 7 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 139.41 |
4 | W. Virginia | 6 | - | 1 | Big East | 131.38 |
5 | Oklahoma | 7 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 130.37 |
6 | Arizona St. | 7 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 127.77 |
7 | S. Florida | 6 | - | 1 | Big East | 127.49 |
8 | Oregon | 6 | - | 1 | Pac 10 | 124.77 |
9 | Boston College | 7 | - | 0 | ACC | 123.22 |
10 | Connecticut | 6 | - | 1 | Big East | 121 |
11 | Hawaii | 7 | - | 0 | WAC | 120.4 |
12 | Virginia Tech | 6 | - | 1 | ACC | 120.13 |
13 | Missouri | 6 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 119.74 |
14 | Boise St. | 6 | - | 1 | WAC | 119.27 |
15 | USC | 6 | - | 1 | Pac 10 | 117.3 |
16 | Penn St. | 6 | - | 2 | Big Ten | 117.1 |
17 | Cincinnati | 6 | - | 2 | Big East | 115.77 |
18 | Florida | 5 | - | 2 | SEC | 115.08 |
19 | New Mexico | 5 | - | 2 | MWC | 114.12 |
20 | BYU | 5 | - | 2 | MWC | 113.51 |
21 | Michigan | 6 | - | 2 | Big Ten | 112.86 |
22 | Virginia | 7 | - | 1 | ACC | 111.39 |
23 | Auburn | 5 | - | 3 | SEC | 111.16 |
24 | Georgia Tech | 5 | - | 3 | ACC | 109.78 |
25 | Kentucky | 6 | - | 2 | SEC | 109.73 |
10/21/07
The Real BCS - Week 8
10/2/07
Week 5 Rankings
Version 1:
Version 2:
Team | Win | Loss | Conference | Score | ||
1 | LSU | 5 | - | 0 | SEC | 156.97 |
2 | Ohio St. | 5 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 143.29 |
3 | Kansas | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 131.69 |
4 | USC | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 127.55 |
5 | Boston College | 5 | - | 0 | ACC | 121.45 |
6 | Oklahoma | 4 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 120.76 |
7 | Arizona St. | 5 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 119.27 |
8 | Cincinnati | 5 | - | 0 | Big East | 117.58 |
9 | Wisconsin | 5 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 115.5 |
10 | Florida | 4 | - | 1 | SEC | 115.14 |
11 | S. Florida | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 114.78 |
12 | Kentucky | 5 | - | 0 | SEC | 114.54 |
13 | Connecticut | 5 | - | 0 | Big East | 114.01 |
14 | Hawaii | 5 | - | 0 | WAC | 112.66 |
15 | W. Virginia | 4 | - | 1 | Big East | 112.42 |
16 | Boise St. | 3 | - | 1 | WAC | 112.23 |
17 | S. Carolina | 4 | - | 1 | SEC | 109.62 |
18 | California | 5 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 109.27 |
19 | Kansas St. | 3 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 108.63 |
20 | Missouri | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 108.58 |
21 | Texas | 4 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 107.8 |
22 | Oregon | 4 | - | 1 | Pac 10 | 106.86 |
23 | Illinois | 4 | - | 1 | Big Ten | 106.75 |
24 | Purdue | 5 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 106.2 |
25 | UCLA | 4 | - | 1 | Pac 10 | 105.78 |
Version 2:
Team | Win | Loss | Conference | Score | ||
1 | LSU | 5 | - | 0 | SEC | 152.48 |
2 | Ohio St. | 5 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 140.59 |
3 | Cincinnati | 5 | - | 0 | Big East | 136.25 |
4 | Kansas | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 134.16 |
5 | Arizona St. | 5 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 131.99 |
6 | S. Florida | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 130.44 |
7 | California | 5 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 128.53 |
8 | USC | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 127.98 |
9 | Oklahoma | 4 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 127.83 |
10 | Connecticut | 5 | - | 0 | Big East | 127.11 |
11 | W. Virginia | 4 | - | 1 | Big East | 126.96 |
12 | Kentucky | 5 | - | 0 | SEC | 126.59 |
13 | Boston College | 5 | - | 0 | ACC | 122.77 |
14 | Hawaii | 5 | - | 0 | WAC | 120.45 |
15 | Florida | 4 | - | 1 | SEC | 118.78 |
16 | Illinois | 4 | - | 1 | Big Ten | 118.67 |
17 | Oregon | 4 | - | 1 | Pac 10 | 117.81 |
18 | Wisconsin | 5 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 115.96 |
19 | Missouri | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 115.89 |
20 | Texas | 4 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 114.43 |
21 | Texas Tech | 4 | - | 1 | Big 12 | 113.59 |
22 | S. Carolina | 4 | - | 1 | SEC | 113.29 |
23 | Michigan St. | 4 | - | 1 | Big Ten | 112.91 |
24 | Wyoming | 3 | - | 1 | MWC | 112.71 |
25 | Purdue | 5 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 112.38 |
9/27/07
I have been BUSY, ok?!
I know I haven't updated the blog in quite a while, but the rankings have been constantly updated. I there is a lot to say about the polls, rankings, etc... But, I just don't have enough time. I do need tell everyone that I have modified the original code to better reflect my original intent. Looking back over the original code, I felt the rankings were lacking, so I created Version 2. So, here are the rankings of both versions after week 4.
VERSION 1:
VERSION 2:
So, we all know LSU is the best, so no arguments there. I will admit, I think version 2 will be more accurate over the course of the season, but I will continue with both of them. I will show mostly version 2 from here on out though.
Anyway, Tech is 51 in both polls, and Notre Dame is 119 in one and 118 in the other, AKA horrible. There are 120 teams in DI-A. I will also show you all the conference rankings soon as well.
VERSION 1:
Team | Win | Loss | Conference | Score | ||
1 | LSU | 4 | - | 0 | SEC | 172.46 |
2 | Oklahoma | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 140.16 |
3 | Ohio St. | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 137.4 |
4 | USC | 3 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 134.18 |
5 | Kansas | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 130.82 |
6 | Florida | 4 | - | 0 | SEC | 130.8 |
7 | Boston College | 4 | - | 0 | ACC | 129.06 |
8 | Rutgers | 3 | - | 0 | Big East | 125.76 |
9 | Cincinnati | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 121.37 |
10 | Oregon | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 119.08 |
11 | W. Virginia | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 118.75 |
12 | Texas | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 117.98 |
13 | Oregon St. | 2 | - | 2 | Pac 10 | 117.86 |
14 | Georgia | 3 | - | 1 | SEC | 117.84 |
15 | Arizona St. | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 115.98 |
16 | Kentucky | 4 | - | 0 | SEC | 113.98 |
17 | Connecticut | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 113.82 |
18 | Purdue | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 112.17 |
19 | S. Florida | 3 | - | 0 | Big East | 110.91 |
20 | Michigan St. | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 110.47 |
21 | Hawaii | 4 | - | 0 | WAC | 110.37 |
22 | S. Carolina | 3 | - | 1 | SEC | 109.53 |
23 | Missouri | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 108.55 |
24 | Boise St. | 2 | - | 1 | WAC | 108.44 |
25 | Wisconsin | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 108.13 |
VERSION 2:
1 | LSU | 4 | - | 0 | SEC | 157.16 |
2 | Oklahoma | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 145.44 |
3 | Ohio St. | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 142.13 |
4 | Rutgers | 3 | - | 0 | Big East | 137.92 |
5 | Florida | 4 | - | 0 | SEC | 137.36 |
6 | Cincinnati | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 135.39 |
7 | Oregon | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 135.07 |
8 | Kansas | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 134.9 |
9 | W. Virginia | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 133.95 |
10 | USC | 3 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 131.09 |
11 | Connecticut | 4 | - | 0 | Big East | 129.6 |
12 | Arizona St. | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 128.26 |
13 | Boston College | 4 | - | 0 | ACC | 127.37 |
14 | Texas | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 126.5 |
15 | S. Florida | 3 | - | 0 | Big East | 125.84 |
16 | California | 4 | - | 0 | Pac 10 | 124.02 |
17 | Kentucky | 4 | - | 0 | SEC | 122.99 |
18 | Hawaii | 4 | - | 0 | WAC | 120.62 |
19 | Michigan St. | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 119.04 |
20 | Wisconsin | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 117.99 |
21 | New Mexico | 3 | - | 1 | MWC | 117.49 |
22 | Purdue | 4 | - | 0 | Big Ten | 116.03 |
23 | S. Carolina | 3 | - | 1 | SEC | 115.16 |
24 | Missouri | 4 | - | 0 | Big 12 | 114.9 |
25 | Illinois | 3 | - | 1 | Big Ten | 114.46 |
So, we all know LSU is the best, so no arguments there. I will admit, I think version 2 will be more accurate over the course of the season, but I will continue with both of them. I will show mostly version 2 from here on out though.
Anyway, Tech is 51 in both polls, and Notre Dame is 119 in one and 118 in the other, AKA horrible. There are 120 teams in DI-A. I will also show you all the conference rankings soon as well.
9/6/07
First Week's Computer Ballot
Well, the day has come to see the rankings. But, I am going to wait a few weeks until we can see some actual averages before I show you a good chunk of the rankings. But I do have some thoughts on what I found from Week 1.
While I was doing my laundry the other day, after I had entered all the game data for this week, I got to thinking. If everyone's stats are compared to the other teams averages for the year shouldn't ever team's score be the same? Because Team A ran 100 yards on Team B. Team A's running was compared to Team B's season average run defense of 100 yards. 100/100 = 1. So, all the teams should be ranked exactly the same. Yes, but no. There are some things that separated teams. One of those is dividing by zero. If a team gave up zero fumbles, then it must be divided by zero which is infinity, so I just assumed their score to be zero (every team WILL have at least one fumble or interception, so it shouldn't be a big deal). Next, how DIAA is done, every team is grouped into a stock DIAA opponent which is an average of all the DIAA stats for the whole year. Thus making anyone who played a DIAA team able to have some differing scores. Pretty exciting, huh?
But because of how heavily win percentage is, the ranking are definitely divided. If you won, you are about 40 points ahead of those that lost. And, for all those Tech fans out there, the Jackets are 23. Its Nice!
So here are the top 4 teams of this weeks rankings, and do not laugh it is only the first week.
So, Maryland is the best team in the country... right. Well, they at least they didn't let a DIAA team score/run on them very much. Woo Hoo. And for the bottom two. You probably guessed it, but NO ONE answered the poll question. Rice and Michigan. Both were beaten by DIAA teams, and apparently Rice got beaten alittle worse. Oh well, maybe next year for that undefeated season Owls.
One other note. Dan sent me a hilarious quote from an article from ESPN's Page 2. It is about football fan rules.
From Rule 1:
Yeah, well, what can I say. I love the comments. Keep them coming. I will also get a new poll up soon. So everyone vote. I know there is at least one person out there reading this. She said I had a good last post.
While I was doing my laundry the other day, after I had entered all the game data for this week, I got to thinking. If everyone's stats are compared to the other teams averages for the year shouldn't ever team's score be the same? Because Team A ran 100 yards on Team B. Team A's running was compared to Team B's season average run defense of 100 yards. 100/100 = 1. So, all the teams should be ranked exactly the same. Yes, but no. There are some things that separated teams. One of those is dividing by zero. If a team gave up zero fumbles, then it must be divided by zero which is infinity, so I just assumed their score to be zero (every team WILL have at least one fumble or interception, so it shouldn't be a big deal). Next, how DIAA is done, every team is grouped into a stock DIAA opponent which is an average of all the DIAA stats for the whole year. Thus making anyone who played a DIAA team able to have some differing scores. Pretty exciting, huh?
But because of how heavily win percentage is, the ranking are definitely divided. If you won, you are about 40 points ahead of those that lost. And, for all those Tech fans out there, the Jackets are 23. Its Nice!
So here are the top 4 teams of this weeks rankings, and do not laugh it is only the first week.
Ranking | Team | Win | Loss | Conference | Score | |
1 | Maryland | 1 | - | 0 | ACC | 148.9 |
2 | Fresno St. | 1 | - | 0 | WAC | 139.26 |
3 | Cincinnati | 1 | - | 0 | Big East | 132.01 |
4 | Air Force | 1 | - | 0 | MWC | 130.01 |
So, Maryland is the best team in the country... right. Well, they at least they didn't let a DIAA team score/run on them very much. Woo Hoo. And for the bottom two. You probably guessed it, but NO ONE answered the poll question. Rice and Michigan. Both were beaten by DIAA teams, and apparently Rice got beaten alittle worse. Oh well, maybe next year for that undefeated season Owls.
One other note. Dan sent me a hilarious quote from an article from ESPN's Page 2. It is about football fan rules.
From Rule 1:
Nor may you root for Harvard and Yale, any more than you could matriculate at both places, unless you're really, really smart, in which case you're probably building prototype military surveillance nanobots in your MIT dorm room, and/or devising a computerized ranking system* to shame Jeff Sagarin.Here is the link
* Note: In scenario No. 2, you are allowed to root for the spread. Just make sure Skynet never becomes self-aware
Yeah, well, what can I say. I love the comments. Keep them coming. I will also get a new poll up soon. So everyone vote. I know there is at least one person out there reading this. She said I had a good last post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)